| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
knightwarrior64 TweakNOOB
Joined: 09 Nov 2003 Posts: 110
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 12:53 am Post subject: how good is a fx 5200? |
|
|
| hi i have an 8x agp geforce fx 5200 128 ddr, is that an ok card? I used to have an geforce 4 mx 420 and i dont see too much differnce execpt its a bit faster graphics and no lag, but graphics look same, i was playing americas army(impressive graphics) So is it a good card? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google Sponsor
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 12:53 am Post subject: Advertisement |
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
[TN] Nathan ALMIGHTY PWNER!

Joined: 14 Feb 2002 Posts: 7406
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, it's a good card, but it is made for the budget sector and is DirectX 9 compliant. _________________ Owner & Administrator
www.Tweaknews.net
www.Pocketbookpinch.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diales TweakNOOB

Joined: 31 Aug 2003 Posts: 91
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diro TweakNOOB
Joined: 06 Nov 2003 Posts: 222 Location: Somewhere in the High Tech World
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2003 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
better video card doesn't necessarily mean better graphics (unless your switching from nvdia to ati ) it usually only means better fps, and more stability. _________________ DiRoLoKo!! I fix robots and wear a bunny suit for a living.....the best job i ever had, most money i ever had :) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alexvdl SirTweaksabit
Joined: 05 Aug 2003 Posts: 311
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2003 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I disagree with Nathan on one point though...
I'm going to state that I don't owna 5200 and am just going off of the numerous reviews I've read.
IF you want a fully DirectX 9 compliant card, skip over the 5200 and grab a 9600. You'll get a better value and ATI actually sat down with Microsoft and worked together so that the ATI hardware follows the standards ESPECIALLY PixelShader 2.0 a lot better. _________________ __________[(Crayola)]>_____________
Althon xp 2100+ @ 2100+, DFI LANParty nForceII Ultra Rev. B, 512 of Kingston, and an Evil Wizard Radeon 7500! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
meobius Tweakafile

Joined: 02 Sep 2003 Posts: 821 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2003 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| not just that but if you've read another post where a guy has a 5200... he says it's performance is crap... definately agree on the call for a 9600pro... more for the money... or if you're really stuck a 9200... (my radeon 7500 64mb is a hell of a lot better than my mx440 i find... it actually made unreal 2k3 playable on a duron 750, and played it better than most of my friends who still had mx440's with 1800+ and 2400+ systems... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
[TN] Nathan ALMIGHTY PWNER!

Joined: 14 Feb 2002 Posts: 7406
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2003 1:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
The FX5200 is supposed to be targeted towards the budget market and is supposed to be used for modest gaming at lower resolutions.
Comparing it to 9600pro's or higher is just not fair because it is not meant to compete with those cards. _________________ Owner & Administrator
www.Tweaknews.net
www.Pocketbookpinch.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alexvdl SirTweaksabit
Joined: 05 Aug 2003 Posts: 311
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2003 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was just pointing out that to get a fully DirectX 9 compliant card you would have to go to the 9600 _________________ __________[(Crayola)]>_____________
Althon xp 2100+ @ 2100+, DFI LANParty nForceII Ultra Rev. B, 512 of Kingston, and an Evil Wizard Radeon 7500! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
[TN] Nathan ALMIGHTY PWNER!

Joined: 14 Feb 2002 Posts: 7406
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alexvdl SirTweaksabit
Joined: 05 Aug 2003 Posts: 311
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2003 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a hard time labeling any card that NVidia currently puts out as Fully DX9 compliant. _________________ __________[(Crayola)]>_____________
Althon xp 2100+ @ 2100+, DFI LANParty nForceII Ultra Rev. B, 512 of Kingston, and an Evil Wizard Radeon 7500! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|