| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
GoNYIsles TweakNOOB
Joined: 02 Jun 2003 Posts: 60
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2003 9:35 am Post subject: NTFS vs. FAT32 |
|
|
| Is the speed difference between NTFS and FAT32 noticeable? I'm currently using FAT32 and was wondering if the conversion would be beneficial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google Sponsor
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2003 9:35 am Post subject: Advertisement |
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
[TN] Nathan ALMIGHTY PWNER!

Joined: 14 Feb 2002 Posts: 7406
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2003 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Be reminded that if you go to NTFS, you won't be able to go back to FAT32.
Just to let you know before you take the plunge. _________________ Owner & Administrator
www.Tweaknews.net
www.Pocketbookpinch.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DMW SirTweaksabit

Joined: 16 May 2002 Posts: 457
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2003 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
partition the drive...a smaller 10 gig partition for the OS is adequate.
since win2K and XP...I always started loading the OS in an NTFS partition, while loading games and MP3s or such other software on separate partitions...
it makes keeping the installs of the games or saved MP3s easier to access from other non NTFS systems...for file sharing and such.
you can select what type of file allocation table you wish to use from the disk management menu after xp is loaded.
In addition to what peer said, NTFS systems also save information and system changes "on the fly" and makes for a better recovery....it's one of the reasons XP will restart and not have to run scan disk like 98 does...
only truly severe errors, usually associated with device failures will cause a report by XP.
if you wanted a quick "how to".....it could be arranged in a follow-up post.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
icyrus76 SirTweaksabit
Joined: 18 Mar 2003 Posts: 307 Location: Edmonton, AB
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2003 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nathan said | Quote: | | "Be reminded that if you go to NTFS, you won't be able to go back to FAT32." |
You COULD go back to FAT32, but you will have to format it from another computer running WinXP, just takes more work, it won't work as well and pleasently if you do it under dos. I've done it a bit too many times...but yeh, too much formatting isn't good either, but if you go to NTFS, then stay with it, like everyone has been saying, its more stable than FAT32, and i think it's faster in reference to Peer's post, i may be wrong.
Cyrus _________________ still the same old computer tweaker..
just with a tad bit of car knowledge as well.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
robin338 TweakNOOB
Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Going back to FAT32 should not be a problem with something like PowerQuest Partition Magic. You will lose some NTFS information, so beware. Sometimes it doesn't work due to NTFS having data in memory which hasn't been written yet. I have done it a few times from on the same computer, running 98Lite and Win2k on FAT32 on the same drive (98 has to be formatted first, unless things have changed). The combo works well, especially if you have some apps that need 98. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger SirTweaksabit
Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Posts: 329 Location: Prolly North Of You
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
we run our office on NTFS (over a hundred users) and i got three of my six systems on my home LAN on NTFS as well. i highly recommend NTFS. the reasons are many. even for a home system, NTFS outperforms FAT32. the only way you'll see a performance hit is if you are using compression and your system isn't that powerful... that has been my experience, although some of you may have seen otherwise. i've got compression running on one of my partitions on a P4 1.8 and i'm not seeing any difference to speak of. (the partition is where i store my music and such, not executable files. although i have compressed folders which house exes and never seen much of a delay.) _________________ i'm the fool, he's the fanboy. together we are Fanboy and Fool... Tweaknews Reviewers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bushman TweakNOOB
Joined: 07 Aug 2003 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2003 11:00 am Post subject: NTFS CONVERSION |
|
|
I have used FAT32 and partitioning my HDD for smaller sizes. I was wondering about NTFS why can't you convert back? What happens if you try? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DMW SirTweaksabit

Joined: 16 May 2002 Posts: 457
|
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2003 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
it's a little misleading the way it reads.....
converting back within windows is a hassle unless a third part y app. is used.
but if you delete the partition, then re-create it....you can format it any way you wish...FAT/FAT32/NTFS.....etc.
ya know....I haven't tried it in some time...I have a few blank partitions here...I'll give it a try and see what comes of it......... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bushman TweakNOOB
Joined: 07 Aug 2003 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2003 10:30 pm Post subject: Thank you |
|
|
I thought I was doing something that you were suppose to do. Cause i deleted the partition and then formatted using FAT32. I was worried by the ONCE YOU GO NTFS YOU CANNT GO BACK cause i thought it did some low level format or something to the drive. I have never really use NTFS format.
Thank you for the info.
bushman  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Geoff TweakNOOB
Joined: 04 Sep 2003 Posts: 1 Location: SoCal
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi All,
Definitely not a wizard here and would appreciate some advice.
Fed up with win2k system not functioning properly because of virus issues and anti-virus software and decided to reinstall the OS.
The drive in question is partitioned into an 8 gig C: system drive (NTFS) and the remaining 32 gigs is the F: drive (FAT 32) I use for storage files.
The reinstall trashed the C drive but left the the F drive files intact.
The last boot/recovery disk (FAT 32) I have contains some programs and and by loading it would simplify having to install alot of programs...so my question is:
Should I reformat the C drive system partition back to FAT 32 so I will be able to this 'orginal' boot/recovery disk or should I leave well enough alone and just spend more time installing all those programs over again??
Geoff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
[TN] Nathan ALMIGHTY PWNER!

Joined: 14 Feb 2002 Posts: 7406
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Keep it NTFS, it's more secure and stable than Fat32.
Completely format the c: Drive and reinstall all the programs. _________________ Owner & Administrator
www.Tweaknews.net
www.Pocketbookpinch.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|